Innovation planet

October 24, 2008

This week’s Nature has an interesting essay by David Edgerton as part of their series on innovation (unfortunately you need a subscription to access the full article. but there is an editor’s summary available for free). The basic thrust of the essay is that national investment in research is not related to the national capacity for innovation, because the knowledge generated by publicly funded research is available globally. The output of R&D is the raw material of innovation, but can be relatively easily sourced globally rather than locally. Fairly obvious stuff really, but, as the essay points out, this is not always reflected in innovation policies. For example, Innovation Nation, the UK Government’s innovation policy, promises that the Government will “…maintain the growing investment in UK science…” as a key part of the strategy to boost national innovation.

Of course, there is an obvious risk here. If Governments across the globe all decide to rely on importing knowledge rather than generating it at home, the globally supply would soon dry up. But this ignores the real value of locally carried out R&D; the skilled people generated by a vibrant research environment. Although people can also move around the world, the barriers to movement are much higher than for knowledge, so a country that wants to be innovative needs to make sure that is has a good supply of people with the right skills. The way in which dynamic and innovative science parks grow up around world leading research universities provides compelling evidence of the importance of appropriately skilled people ‘on the ground’.

On this basis, the real value of national investment in research is the people involved, not the knowledge generated. This has a profound implication for research policy. Research funding needs to be targeted at generating people with the right skills, rather than at highly directed innovation targets. If public research is targeted, then better to address public policy challenges where the most important impacts are on national policy-making rather than innovation. And measuring the value of public research investment would be better focussed on human rather than financial capital.

2 Responses to “Innovation planet”

  1. i’m usually scurrying all across the internet nearly all of the morning therefore I have the inclination to read a lot, which unfortunately is not typically a beneficial option as almost all of the internet websites I look at are composed of worthless waste copied from various other sites a zillion times, nonetheless I have to compliment you because this website is genuinely readable and has some unique material, so many thanks for removing the pattern of only duplicating other folks’ sites, in case you ever want to play a couple of hands of facebook poker together with me just send me a message – you have my email address 🙂

  2. […] of research poses a problem in that it may make the benefits harder to harvest. As I have written before, this isn’t a real problem. Cross-national research generates the best outcomes that […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: